FSSC 22000 Version 7
- M. DuBose
- 6 days ago
- 5 min read
Updated: 5 days ago
Key Takeaways from the Official Insights Webinar
The Foundation FSSC recently hosted its Insights Webinar: Introducing Version 7, drawing more than 6,000 participants from around the world. Led by Neil Milvain, Elsa Matia, and Kelly Moholland, the session walked through the motivations behind Version 7, the major structural updates, and what certified organizations should expect as they prepare for the transition. The discussion made it clear that Version 7 represents an evolution of the scheme, one that strengthens alignment with global standards, clarifies expectations, and supports the industry’s growing focus on sustainability.
Elsa opened the webinar with a reminder of why so many organizations choose FSSC 22000. The scheme is built on ISO standards, which means it provides a strong, science‑based foundation for food safety management systems. Its alignment with the ISO Harmonized Structure makes it easier for companies to integrate food safety with other management systems, and its long‑standing GFSI recognition continues to support global acceptance. Today, more than 40,000 certificates have been issued, reflecting the trust the industry places in the scheme and the strength of the Foundation’s integrity program.
The presenters then moved into the reasons behind the release of Version 7. One of the most significant drivers was the introduction of the new ISO 22002 series for prerequisite programs (PRPs). These new standards replace the older technical specifications and bring a more unified structure to PRP requirements across the food chain. Version 7 also aligns the scheme with the 2024 GFSI Benchmarking Requirements, strengthens support for organizations working toward sustainability goals, and introduces a clearer structure for food chain subcategories to ensure auditors have the right technical competencies. The Foundation also used this opportunity to make editorial improvements and clarify language throughout the scheme.
A major portion of the webinar focused on the new ISO 22002 PRP series. The updated structure introduces a common PRP standard Part 100, that applies across all sectors, with additional sector‑specific parts layered on top. This change is intended to simplify implementation for multi‑sector organizations and create more consistent expectations for auditors and certified sites. Because clause numbers and structures have changed, organizations will need to update their documentation to reflect the new format. Some requirements were removed from the PRPs because they are already covered in ISO 22000, such as product recall procedures.
Another important update in Version 7 is the introduction of sub‑subcategories for certain sectors. These were added to ensure that auditors have the appropriate technical knowledge for the specific processes and technologies used at each site. While this does not affect certificates themselves, it does influence how certification bodies assign auditors and manage competency.
Kelly then walked through the updates to the FSSC 22000 Additional Requirements. Several changes were made to align with GFSI’s 2024 benchmarking requirements, including updates to laboratory analysis expectations, food defense, food fraud mitigation, and food safety and quality culture. The scheme now clarifies that threat, and vulnerability assessments must be developed by personnel with appropriate competence, and senior management must ensure adequate resources to support a positive food safety and quality culture.
Other updates were made based on stakeholder feedback and continuous improvement. Artwork and print control requirements now apply to any organization that prints labels or materials, not just packaging manufacturers. Allergen management expectations were clarified for pet food and animal feed producers, especially when allergen‑related claims are made. Routine PRP verification activities now apply to catering, food service, retail, and wholesale. Shelf-life validation requirements were clarified for specific food chain categories, and a new requirement was added to ensure traceability of edible carcass parts until they are deemed fit for human consumption.
One of the most notable additions is a new requirement for organizations that design primary packaging. Developed with support from the World Packaging Organization and the Australasian Institute of Packaging, this requirement focuses on packaging design principles that help reduce food loss and waste. It reflects the Foundation’s commitment to supporting the industry’s sustainability efforts and aligns with global expectations around responsible production.
The Foundation also used the webinar to gather feedback on a potential voluntary environmental addendum that could apply to both FSSC 22000 and FSSC 24000. Attendees were asked whether such an addendum is needed, what it should include, and what additional topics might be valuable. The results will be reviewed after the session.
Overall, Version 7 reinforces the Foundation’s commitment to maintaining a credible, globally recognized certification scheme that evolves with industry needs. Organizations should begin reviewing their PRP documentation, additional requirements, auditor competency expectations, and sustainability‑related objectives to prepare for the transition. More guidance materials will be released by the Foundation to support a smooth and successful upgrade.
FSSC 22000 Version 6 vs. Version 7 Comparison Table
Area | Version 6 | Version 7 | What This Means for Industry |
Prerequisite Programs (PRPs) | Based on ISO/TS 22002 series | Updated to the new ISO 22002 series (Parts 100 + sector‑specific parts) | Organizations must update PRP documentation and clause references to match the new structure. |
PRP Structure | Sector‑specific TS documents only | Introduces Part 100 (common PRPs) + sector parts | More consistency across sectors; clearer expectations for multi‑sector sites. |
Clause Numbering | Older TS numbering | New ISO 22002 numbering | Documentation, SOPs, and internal audits must be updated to reflect new clause numbers. |
Product Recall Requirements | Included in PRPs | Removed from PRPs (covered in ISO 22000 clause 8.9.5) | No loss of requirement just relocated. |
Food Chain Categories | Subcategories only | Adds sub‑subcategories for certain sectors (C0, C1, C4, I, K) | Ensures auditors have the correct technical competency for specific processes. |
Laboratory Requirements | Clarified through BOS decisions | Fully integrated; must follow ISO/IEC 17025 | Stronger expectations for accredited or compliant lab testing. |
Food Defense & Food Fraud | Requirements present but less defined | Plans must be developed by competent personnel | Higher expectations for expertise and documentation. |
Food Safety & Quality Culture | Culture required but less explicit | Senior management must provide sufficient resources; all personnel must demonstrate commitment | Stronger emphasis on leadership accountability. |
Artwork & Print Control | Applied mainly to packaging manufacturers | Applies to any organization printing labels or materials | Expands scope to food and feed manufacturers who print in‑house. |
Allergen Management | Applied to animal feed | Now applies to pet food when allergen claims are made | Clarifies expectations for “hypoallergenic” or similar claims. |
PRP Verification (Site Inspections) | Applied to most sectors | Now includes catering, food service, retail, wholesale | Expands routine inspection expectations. |
Shelf-Life Validation | General requirement | Applies specifically to B3, C, D, K with ongoing verification | Clearer expectations for shelf‑life trials and risk‑based verification. |
Traceability of Edible Carcass Parts | Not included | New requirement added from BOS decision | Supports GFSI compliance for animal‑based sectors. |
Food Loss & Waste | Required but less defined | Must include measurable targets with timelines | Stronger alignment with sustainability and SDGs. |
Packaging Design Requirement | Not included | New requirement for organizations that design primary packaging | Supports global efforts to reduce food loss and waste through packaging design. |
Environmental Addendum | Not available | Under consideration (voluntary) | Industry feedback being collected; may support environmental data and GHG alignment. |
Comments