History and Pros & Cons of Saccharin
- M. DuBose
- Jul 16
- 6 min read
The Sweet and Bittersweet History of Saccharin
Saccharin is the world’s oldest artificial sweetener, discovered by chance in the 19th century and embraced as a sugar substitute for over a century.
As we explore the rich history of saccharin, from its fortuitous discovery through its commercialization and regulatory battles to its cultural and economic impact.
We will also examine the pros and cons of saccharin, covering health implications, environmental considerations, and market dynamics.
Whether you’re curious about food science, regulation, or diet culture, this blog offers a professional, in-depth look at saccharin’s history.
Target Audience
General Audience:
Health-conscious consumers seeking sugar alternatives
Students and educators interested in food chemistry and regulation
Anyone curious about the intersections of science, policy, and culture
Each section uses clear language and relatable examples to make complex topics accessible to non-specialists.
1. Discovery and Early Years
1.1 Serendipitous Discovery In 1878, Constantin Fahlberg, a Russian postdoctoral researcher in the lab of Ira Remsen at Johns Hopkins University, accidentally discovered saccharin when he noticed an unusually sweet taste on his dinner roll.
He traced the sweetness to a beaker containing o-sulfobenzoic acid treated with phosphorus(V) chloride and ammonia, benzoic sulfimide, later named saccharin.
Remsen and Fahlberg published their joint findings in 1879, noting saccharin was “even sweeter than cane sugar”, though initially neither pursued commercialization.
1.2 Patenting and Commercial Uptake In 1884, Fahlberg applied for German and U.S. patents without Remsen’s involvement, claiming the discovery as his own and igniting a dispute with his former mentor.
By 1886, Fahlberg’s patented process enabled industrial production of five kilograms of saccharin per day in New York City, sold in pill and powder forms.
Saccharin quickly found uses: as a preservative in canning, a prescription for headaches and obesity, and a sugar substitute for diabetics.
2. Regulatory Battles and Wartime Demand
2.1 The Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906: Public outrage over food adulteration led to the Pure Food and Drug Act in 1906, empowering the Bureau of Chemistry to regulate additives.
Harvey Washington Wiley, Bureau chief, argued saccharin—a coal-tar derivative—was unsafe, but President Theodore Roosevelt dismissed the concerns, calling anyone who opposed saccharin “an idiot.”
2.2 Adulterant Classification and Sugar Shortages: In 1912, saccharin was labeled an “adulterant,” barring its use in processed foods, yet industry pushback and consumer demand kept it available.
World War I sugar rationing revived saccharin’s popularity; advertising touted its patriotic and economic benefits, and consumers bought it by the boxful.
A second surge occurred during World War II as another sugar shortage hit, cementing saccharin’s role as a key sugar substitute in desperate times.
3. Birth of Diet Culture
3.1 Sweet’N Low and Cyclamate: Post-World War II diet culture propelled saccharin into mainstream weight-control markets.
In 1950, Cumberland Packing launched Sweet’N Low, a blend of saccharin and cyclamate, which masked saccharin’s metallic aftertaste and tripled diet soda share between 1963 and 1967.
3.2 The Delaney Clause and Cancer Concerns: The Food Additives Amendment of 1958 introduced the Delaney Clause, banning carcinogens in foods. Saccharin’s “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) status was revoked in 1972 after rat studies showed bladder cancer.
4. Health Controversies and Labeling
4.1 Animal Cancer Studies: In 1970, University of Wisconsin researchers linked saccharin to bladder tumors in male rats, prompting the FDA to remove saccharin from the GRAS list.
Subsequent mechanistic studies demonstrated that the cancerous mechanism—urinary calcium phosphate precipitates causing cell proliferation—was unique to rats and not relevant to humans.
4.2 The Saccharin Study and Labeling Act of 1977Congress responded with the Saccharin Study and Labeling Act of 1977, imposing an 18-month moratorium on a ban and mandating warning labels:
“This product may be hazardous to your health. This product contains saccharin, which has been determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals.”
The moratorium and labels were renewed until 2000, when the National Toxicology Program formally delisted saccharin as a carcinogen.
5. Modern Regulatory Resolutions
5.1 NTP and IARC Delisting: In 1998, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) downgraded saccharin to Group 3: Not classifiable as carcinogenic to humans, citing non-relevance of rat data.
In 2000, the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) removed saccharin from its Report on Carcinogens, concluding human risk was negligible.
5.2 EPA De-Listing of Hazardous Status: In 2010, the EPA removed saccharin and its salts from the lists of hazardous constituents and substances under RCRA and CERCLA, based on NTP and IARC findings and waste management data showing minimal environmental risk.
6. Cultural and Social Impacts
6.1 Women, Modernity, and the Saccharin Smile: In the 1950s, saccharin became a symbol of modern, calorie-conscious living for women. Rather than baking sugar-rich goods for family, hostess gifts of saccharin tablets at dinner parties signified independence and self-focus.
The saccharin smile, tiny pink packets and fizzy pills, melded scientific progress with domestic comfort, transforming the meaning of sweetness.
6.2 Public Perception and Consumer Rights: The saccharin saga galvanized public opinion over regulatory authority. Consumer rights advocates framed government efforts to restrict saccharin as “big government” overreach, successfully lobbying Congress to preserve saccharin availability.
7. Economic Factors and Market Evolution
7.1 Affordability and Global Adoption: Saccharin’s low production cost and stability made it the foundation of many sugar-free products worldwide, from tabletop sweeteners to canned fruit.
Even in the 1990s, saccharin remained a key ingredient in multi-sweetener blends for its synergistic effects and low cost.
7.2 Competition from New Sweeteners? The rise of aspartame (1981), sucralose (1990s), and neotame (2002) introduced sweeter compounds with fewer taste drawbacks, nibbling away at saccharin’s market share.
Global saccharin consumption reached 28,000 tonnes in 1995, with 4,500 tonnes used in the U.S., indicating substantial market scale despite competition.
8. Environmental and Waste Management Considerations
8.1 Production Footprint: Saccharin production involves chemical syntheses that generate by-products requiring careful disposal. Pre-2010, saccharin salts were listed as hazardous waste under RCRA due to potential carcinogenic classification.
8.2 Regulatory Easing and Cost Savings: Following EPA’s delisting in December 2010, saccharin waste could be managed as non-hazardous, reducing paperwork, reporting requirements, and waste management costs for industries.
9. Pros and Cons of Saccharin
9.1 Advantages
Advantage | Implication |
Zero calories | Aids in weight management and diabetic diets; does not spike blood sugar levels. |
High stability | Suitable for baked goods and long-shelf-life products. |
Cost-effective | Lower production costs compared to sugar and many low-calorie sweeteners. |
Dental health | Non-fermentable by oral bacteria, reducing cavity risk. |
Regulatory clearance | Endorsed as safe by FDA, EFSA, NTP, and IARC. |
Saccharin’s pronounced sweetness potency allows manufacturers to use minute quantities, achieving desired flavor while controlling costs and calories.
9.2 Disadvantages
Disadvantage | Implication |
Metallic aftertaste | Requires blending with other sweeteners or flavor masking agents. |
Early cancer controversies | Historical rat studies raised public skepticism despite later human-relevant data. |
Possible gut microbiota effects | Preliminary evidence suggests high intake may alter gut bacteria balance. |
Public perception | Lingering doubts due to past label warnings and bans. |
Environmental concerns | Production processes can create chemical waste that needs careful management. |
Saccharin’s bitter aftertaste drove the development of blends such as Sweet’N Low, combining cyclamate to mask bitterness—a solution whose mechanism was only understood in 2017, when it was shown each sweetener blocks the other’s bitter receptors
10. Current Status and Future Outlook
Although saccharin’s market share has declined with the advent of newer sweeteners, it remains a viable low-calorie option, especially in niche applications like pharmaceuticals and oral care.
Emerging research focuses on production sustainability and environmental impact reduction, aiming for greener synthetic pathways.
Consumer trends toward clean labels and natural sweeteners challenge saccharin’s appeal, but its cost and stability properties ensure it remains part of the sweetener portfolio for many manufacturers.
Saccharin’s journey from a laboratory accident to a diet-culture icon exemplifies the complex interplay of science, regulation, culture, and economics.
Its history is marked by pioneering discoveries, presidential endorsements, public outcry, and rigorous scientific scrutiny.
The pros: zero calories, stability, affordability, must be weighed against the cons: taste issues, historical controversies, and environmental considerations.
Understanding saccharin’s past offers valuable lessons on how scientific evidence, public perception, and regulatory policy shape the fate of food ingredients.
As sweetener science advances, saccharin remains a testament to serendipity and the evolving landscape of our search for the perfect sweetness without the sugar.
References:
The Pursuit of Sweet - Science History Institute
Part I: The 1906 Food and Drugs Act and Its Enforcement | FDA
U.S. National Toxicology Program and International Agency ... - Saccharin
Saccharin Study and Labeling Act of 1977 - Wikipedia
Saccharin Final Rule | Waste Identification | Wastes | US EPA
Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of ...
That Saccharin Smile Rooted in Women's Search for Modernity
oehha.ca.gov Evidence on the carcinogenicity of sodium saccharin
History of Saccharin « Saccharin.org
Two artificial sweeteners together take the bitter out of bittersweet
Comments