Why Your Corrective Actions Keep Failing: Understanding the Difference Between Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)

In food safety programs, few terms are mixed up as often, or as consequentially, as Corrective Action and Preventive Action.

Managers use them interchangeably, auditors flag them repeatedly, and teams struggle to implement them effectively. The result? Recurring issues, frustrated staff, and systems that look compliant on paper but fail in practice.

The truth is simple: If you don’t understand the difference, your corrective actions will keep failing.

The confusion is not only a vocabulary problem, but also a mindset problem. FSMA made that mindset shift non-negotiable.

Why do Managers Mix Up the Term? In many facilities, managers often treat every issue as a quick fix. A process temperature drifts outside its required limits, and the response is simply to adjust the setting or remind the operator to pay closer attention. A sanitation step is missing, so the line gets re-cleaned. A record is incomplete, so someone fills in the blanks. These are corrections, not corrective actions.

Managers often skip the deeper steps because they’re busy, understaffed, or simply unaware of the regulatory expectations. But skipping those steps is exactly why the same problems keep resurfacing.

Corrective Action: What it Actually Requires

Under 21 CFR 117.150, a compliant corrective action must:

• Identify and correct the problem

• Reduce the likelihood of recurrence

• Evaluate all affected food for safety

• Prevent unsafe food from entering commerce

• Be fully documented and verified

This is far more than “retrain the employee.” It’s a structured, root‑cause‑driven process.

GFSI‑benchmarked schemes reinforce this expectation. For example, PrimusGFS requires corrective actions to include root cause, mitigation of immediate issues, corrective steps, preventive actions, and evidence of completion and all within defined timelines.

Preventive Action: The Most Misunderstood Tool in the Toolbox

Preventive Action is proactive. It addresses potential issues before they occur.

In the FSMA era, Preventive Action is embedded in the entire concept of Preventive Controls, a shift from reacting to problems to designing systems that prevent them. FSMA requires facilities to identify reasonably foreseeable hazards and implement controls to significantly minimize or prevent them.

This is where many managers get tripped up:

• They wait for a failure before taking action.

• They treat every issue as a corrective action, even when it signals a systemic weakness that requires preventive thinking.

• They don’t trend data to identify patterns that could predict future failures.

Preventive Action is not optional; it’s the backbone of modern food safety systems.

How FSMA Shifted the Industry from Reactive to Preventive Thinking? Before FSMA, many programs operated under a fix it when it breaks” mentality. FSMA changed that by requiring:

• Hazard analysis based on foreseeable risks

• Preventive controls instead of relying solely on CCPs

• Verification activities to ensure controls are effective

• Reanalysis of the food safety plan when corrective actions reveal systemic issues

Corrective actions now serve as a trigger for deeper evaluation. If a preventive control fails, the facility must not only correct the issue but also reassess the food safety plan to determine whether modifications are needed.

This is the heart of preventive thinking: Corrective actions aren’t the end of the process; they’re the beginning of improvement.

How to Tell the Difference. Here’s a simple way to explain it to your team:

If the problem already happened…	Corrective Action
If the problem hasn’t happened yet, but could…	Preventive Action

Corrective Action Fixes the Past. Preventive Action Protects the Future.

When teams internalize this distinction, everything improves, audit outcome, operation consistency, and ultimately, food safety.

Why Getting This Right Matters

• Regulatory compliance: FSMA requires documented corrective action procedures and effective preventive controls.

• Audit performance: GFSI schemes expect root cause analysis, preventive actions, and evidence‑based closure of non‑conformances.

• Reduced rework and waste: Recurring issues cost time, money, and credibility.

• Stronger food safety culture: Teams shift from firefighting to strategic problem‑solving.

• Better protection for consumers: The goal of every food safety system.

Your corrective actions keep failing because they’re not truly corrective, and because preventive actions aren’t being used to their full potential.

FSMA made it clear that Food Safety is no longer about reacting, it’s about prevention.

When Managers embrace that shift, the entire system becomes stronger, more resilient, and more aligned with modern regulatory expectations.

Listed below are a few examples of food safety scenarios that may require Correction, Corrective Action and/or Preventive Action, so that you can better understand the differences.

Correction, Corrective Action & Preventive Action
Scenario 1: Cooler Temperature Out of Limits
Food Safety Problem: A refrigerated cooler is recorded at 48°F (above the required limit)
Correction (Immediate Fix) Move product to another functioning cooler. Adjust or repair the cooler to bring it back into temperature. Document the disposition of affected product. Purpose: Fix the immediate issue so food is protected right now.
Corrective Action (Root‑Cause + Recurrence Prevention) Conduct a root cause analysis: The evaporator fan failed due to lack of maintenance. Evaluate all products exposed to elevated temperatures for safety. Hold or discard products as appropriate. Repair or replace the fan. Verify the cooler maintains temperature after repair. Document the entire process per 21 CFR 117.150. Purpose: Address the underlying cause and ensure unsafe food does not enter commerce.
Preventive Action (Proactive System Improvement) Add the cooler’s evaporator fan to the preventive maintenance schedule. Increase frequency of temperature trending reviews. Install a high‑temperature alarm with notifications. Retrain maintenance staff on monitoring critical equipment. Purpose: Prevent the issue from happening again in the future.
Scenario 2: Allergen Labeling Error
Food Safety Problem: A product containing soy is found on the packaging line with a label missing the soy allergen declaration.
Correction (Immediate Fix) Stop the line. Remove and segregate all mislabeled products. Re‑label or dispose of affected units.
Corrective Action (Root‑Cause + Recurrence Prevention) Perform root cause analysis: Operator skipped the label verification step. Review all products produced since the last verified check. Place product on hold and evaluate for recall risk. Retrain the operator on allergen label checks. Add a supervisor verification step for the next 24 hours.
Preventive Action (Proactive System Improvement) Implement a barcode scanning system to prevent the wrong label from being applied. Update the SOP to require dual verification for allergen‑containing products. Trend allergen‑related deviations quarterly to identify patterns.
Scenario 3: Incomplete Sanitation Record
Food Safety Problem: A sanitation record is missing the signature and verification for a pre‑operational check.
Correction (Immediate Fix) Have the employee responsible complete the missing information (if still within the same shift). Re‑inspect the area to ensure it is clean and safe.
Corrective Action (Root‑Cause + Recurrence Prevention) Conduct root cause analysis: Employee was covering two lines and rushed through documentation. Review other records from the same shift for completeness. Retrain the employee on documentation requirements. Re-assign responsibilities to ensure adequate coverage.
Preventive Action (Proactive System Improvement) Adjust staffing to avoid dual‑line coverage during sanitation. Implement a digital record system that prevents incomplete submissions. Add periodic internal audits focused on documentation accuracy.

Are you interested in taking In-Person Food Safety Workshop Courses? Check out our current Workshops now and save with this $200 coupon code workshop2026 at time of checkout

PCQI v. 2.0 Course April 14 - 16, 2026

Book Now

SQF 10 - Be Prepared! May 12 - 13, 2026

Book Now

Food Safety HACCP Plan Development 6-1

Book Now

Mastering Food Safety-Advanced HACCP 6-3

Book Now

SQF 10 - Be Prepared! June 23 - 24, 2026

Book Now